Hernandez: Celebrities' public pronouncements can warp a debate because people grant more weight to celebrities' opinions than to ordinary people's. ███ ████ ███████ ███████████ ██████ █████ ███████ ████████ █████ █████████████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██ ██████████
████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████████ ██ ██ ███ █████ █████ ██ ██████ ████ █████ ████████ ████ ████████ ████ ████ ███████ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████ █████████████ ████████
Hernandez concludes that celebrities should stay out of public debates unless they have expertise on the issue being debated. This is because people consider celebrities' opinions to be extra important, which in turn means that celebrities' statements can warp the debate.
Liu concludes that it's "absurd" to exclude celebrities from public debates, i.e., celebrities should be free to participate in public debates. In support, Liu states that celebrities are still members of their communities. The implication is that community members should all be able to participate in public debates.
We're looking for a disagreement between Hernandez and Liu. The two speakers disagree about whether celebrities should stay out of public debates when they don't have relevant expertise. Hernandez states that position as a conclusion, whereas Liu's conclusion is that such a belief is "absurd."
Hernandez and Liu disagree with ████ █████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
People grant more ██████ ██ ████████████ ████████ ████ ██ ████████ █████████
Celebrities should avoid ███████ ████████ █████ █████████████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██ ██████████
Celebrities' pronouncements on █████████████ ██████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ███████
The public should █████████ ████ ███████████ ███ █████ █████████████ ███████
Celebrities are responsible ███ ███ ████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ████████ ████ ████████ ████ ████ ███████